A comprehensive internal readiness check across all 59 sub-standards
How to Use This Self-Assessment Tool
Navigate the tabs to review each pillar: Leadership & Management, Service Delivery, and Clients' & Families' Rights.
Identify priorities using the badges: Essential (must be met), Guideline (raises your ceiling), and Safety Booster (highest-risk items).
Read "What Good Looks Like" for each requirement to understand full compliance without re-reading the standard.
Check "Examples of Evidence" and start gathering or creating those documents now, before an assessor arrives.
Rate your center's practice from 0 to 4 using the scale below.
Add notes on where evidence lives, who owns it, or what's still missing.
Review your results in the "Your Results" tab for a rough readiness percentage by area.
Print or save your completed assessment for your records.
Rating Scale:
0 — Not in place: No documented practice exists yet for this requirement.
1 — Informal only: Something happens in practice, but it isn't written down or approved.
2 — Documented: A written policy or procedure exists, but it isn't consistently followed yet.
3 — Consistently applied: Staff follow the practice reliably in day-to-day operations.
4 — Embedded & reviewed: Applied consistently, and periodically reviewed or improved over time.
Readiness Levels:
Green (70%+) — Strong readiness in this area.
Amber (40-69%) — Developing — attention needed before assessment.
Red (<40%) — Significant gaps — prioritize this area first.
Note: This is an internal tool for your team to gauge readiness. It is not the official assessment and will not predict your formal result. The standard itself remains the authoritative source.
1.1 Institutional Governance
1.1.1
Governance and Leadership Structures
ESSENTIAL SAFETY BOOSTER
What "Good" Looks Like:
A written strategic vision for cultural inclusivity with measurable, time-bound targets; active staff training on inclusive practice; diverse representation in decision-making; and inclusive recruitment and service-evaluation policies — all documented, implemented, and reviewed periodically.
Examples of Evidence:
Dated strategic vision document with measurable equity/inclusivity targets; cultural-competence training records; advisory committee meeting minutes showing input into decisions; recruitment and evaluation policy referencing cultural competence.
1.1.2
Accountability and Transparency Mechanisms
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clear written documentation of who is responsible for oversight, protection, financial control, performance evaluation and complaints handling; a performance measurement system tracking outcomes and publishing periodic reports; and proactive monitoring that catches and closes compliance gaps quickly.
Examples of Evidence:
Accountability/roles matrix naming owners for oversight, protection, finance, and complaints; published performance report; compliance-gap tracking log with closure dates.
1.2 Admin & Financial Organization
1.2.1
Effective Organizational Structures
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clearly defined, published roles and reporting lines for care teams (with specialist assignment for complex cases); practices documented against recognized references and kept current; a shared case management system connecting disciplines; and effectiveness indicators reviewed regularly.
Examples of Evidence:
Published organizational chart with reporting lines; documented practice references kept current; case-management system access/usage log; structure effectiveness review notes.
1.2.2
Resource Management and Financial Transparency
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
A documented budgeting and resource-allocation approach aligned to community need; regular financial and operational reporting; independent auditing of finances and investments; and a share of budget dedicated to quality and innovation, all reported transparently.
Examples of Evidence:
Approved annual budget with allocation rationale; financial/operational reporting pack; independent financial audit report; quality-improvement budget line item.
1.3 Community Participation
1.3.1
Participation in Service Planning
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Structured mechanisms (surveys, focus groups, advisory input) that let clients, families, and community members shape service planning and program design; input is documented and shown to influence decisions.
Formal partnerships with community organizations, government bodies, and other providers that expand services and referral pathways; partnerships are reviewed periodically for value and renewed or adjusted accordingly.
Examples of Evidence:
Signed partnership or MOU agreements; referral-pathway documentation; partnership review notes.
1.4 Quality Improvement & Risk Management
1.4.1
Quality Management and Performance Improvement
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
A documented quality-improvement system with defined KPIs, regular internal reviews, and a visible cycle of identifying issues, implementing changes, and verifying they worked.
Examples of Evidence:
Quality-improvement plan with defined KPIs; internal review reports; before/after evidence of a completed improvement cycle.
1.4.2
Strategic Risk Management
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
An organization-wide risk register covering operational, safety, financial, and reputational risks, reviewed regularly with named owners and mitigation plans for the highest-priority risks.
Examples of Evidence:
Risk register with named owners; risk-review meeting minutes; mitigation plan for a top-rated risk.
1.5 Workforce Management
1.5.1
Strategic Workforce Planning
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
A staffing plan that anticipates future service needs, tracks headcount against demand, and includes succession planning for key roles.
Examples of Evidence:
Staffing plan / headcount forecast; succession plan for key roles.
1.5.2
Professional Development and Performance
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Structured onboarding, ongoing training aligned to role requirements, and regular performance reviews with documented development plans for each staff member.
Examples of Evidence:
Onboarding checklist; training completion log; performance review records with documented development plans.
1.5.3
Specialized Competencies and Continuity
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Identification of specialized skills the organization depends on (clinical, technical, linguistic), with cross-training or backup coverage so service continuity doesn't rely on a single individual.
Examples of Evidence:
Skills/competency inventory; cross-training records; backup-coverage roster for specialized roles.
1.5.4
Supportive Environment and Culture
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Documented staff wellbeing and engagement practices (workload monitoring, feedback channels, recognition), with periodic staff satisfaction measurement and action on the results.
A data governance policy covering access controls, retention, and breach response; regular security reviews; and staff trained on data-handling obligations.
Examples of Evidence:
Data governance policy; access-control audit log; security review report; staff data-handling training records.
1.6.2
Digital Transformation and Innovation
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
A roadmap for adopting digital tools that improve service delivery or efficiency, with a defined process for piloting, evaluating, and scaling new technology.
Examples of Evidence:
Digital-adoption roadmap; pilot evaluation report; technology rollout plan.
1.6.3
Data Analytics and Decision Support
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Operational and outcome data collected consistently enough to support management decision-making, with periodic reporting that actually informs planning.
Examples of Evidence:
Operational/outcome data dashboard; periodic management report referencing data-driven decisions.
1.7 Legal Compliance
1.7.1
Legal Management and Compliance Assurance
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
A tracked register of applicable laws, licenses, and regulatory obligations, with a defined process for monitoring changes and confirming ongoing compliance.
Examples of Evidence:
Regulatory/licensing register; compliance-monitoring log; evidence of a tracked regulatory change being actioned.
2.1 Access to Services
2.1.1
Informing Potential Clients, Families and Caregivers
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clear, multi-channel published information on services, eligibility, fees and limitations; transparent waiting-list management with status updates; accessible digital platforms in multiple languages; and information kept current as policies change.
Examples of Evidence:
Published service/eligibility/fee information (print and digital, multiple languages); waiting-list tracker with status updates; website/app accessibility check.
2.1.2
New Client Onboarding
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
A structured orientation program (tours, introductions, rights education, initial needs assessment) backed by an integrated follow-up system during the adjustment period, plus a defined channel for ongoing family engagement.
Clear communication when a service is ending, with detailed alternatives; a documented transition plan agreed with all parties within a set timeframe; practical and emotional support plus follow-up after transfer; and secure, confidential transfer of client records.
Examples of Evidence:
Completed transition plan for a real case; alternative-provider referral list; secure record-transfer log.
2.1.4
Universal Accessibility and Decision-Making
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Facilities and digital tools that meet accessibility standards; information available in multiple formats; access tailored to each person's needs and abilities; assistive tools/technology supporting decision-making; and staff trained to deliver services remotely.
Examples of Evidence:
Facility/digital accessibility audit; multi-format information samples (Braille, large print); remote-service-delivery staff training record.
2.2 Physical Environment, Equipment & Resources
2.2.1
Safe and Inclusive Facility Design
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Facilities built to universal design principles (ramps, tactile signage, private consultation spaces); environmental systems (lighting, ventilation, temperature) meeting regulation; and safety features like non-slip flooring, handrails and clear signage.
Examples of Evidence:
Facility safety/accessibility inspection checklist; building compliance certificate; signage and safety-feature photos.
2.2.2
Appropriate Facilities and Equipment
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Assistive tools and communication devices available and well maintained; comfortable rest areas; secure, encrypted storage of sensitive information; and a documented cleaning/maintenance schedule with regular inspections.
Regular documented inspections identifying environmental fall risks; individual fall-prevention plans developed with the client/family; and clear, staff-trained response plans for when falls occur.
Examples of Evidence:
Fall-risk environmental inspection report; individual fall-prevention plan sample; fall-response protocol with staff training record.
2.2.4
Infection Prevention and Control
ESSENTIAL SAFETY BOOSTER
What "Good" Looks Like:
Approved infection-control protocols with mandatory violation reporting and special protocols for high-risk groups; visible hygiene facilities and signage; continuous staff training; and regular review of practices feeding into improvement plans.
Safety-compliant electrical/plumbing systems and accessible emergency equipment; monitoring and automated incident-reporting systems; and realistic emergency drills (fire, disaster) with documented evaluation and lessons learned.
Examples of Evidence:
Emergency-equipment inspection log; incident-reporting system export; emergency drill records with evaluation checklists.
2.3 Case Assessment & Care Planning
2.3.1
Person-Centered Assessment and Planning
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Comprehensive assessments using standardized tools covering physical, psychological and social needs; family needs assessed and supported; individualized care plans built with client/family consent; consistent documentation; and structured feedback mechanisms to update plans.
Examples of Evidence:
De-identified sample assessment and care plan; consent record; plan review/update log; client/family feedback record.
2.3.2
Age-Appropriate Assessment (Children)
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Regular age-appropriate developmental assessments; targeted support programs updated when a child's development deviates from expectations; formal collaboration with specialists when needed; and structured educational programs for families.
Examples of Evidence:
Developmental assessment tool and results; specialist collaboration record; family education program attendance log.
2.3.3
Vocational Training and Employment Support
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Structured vocational assessment, skills training, and job-placement or employment-transition support for clients able to pursue work, coordinated with external employers or training bodies where relevant.
Use of recognized evidence-based frameworks to guide interventions; individualized care plans that measure family satisfaction; structured procedures for smooth transitions between services; and tailored support for complex or cognitive-health cases with regular monitoring.
Examples of Evidence:
Evidence-based practice framework document; case notes showing protocol applied; complex-case monitoring log.
2.4.2
Reducing Variations in Practice
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Consistent, up-to-date practice guidelines applied across all teams and linked to staff performance evaluation; ongoing training on cultural competence; and active monitoring to identify and close gaps or disparities in care.
Examples of Evidence:
Current practice guidelines document; staff performance evaluation referencing guideline adherence; cultural-competence training record.
2.4.3
Appropriate Interventions
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Interventions based on licensed, validated tools used only by qualified practitioners; clients/families given clear information on risks and expected outcomes; interventions designed around current research and feasibility; family involvement; and regular evaluation of effectiveness.
Care plans that respect personal preference and build functional ability; continuity ensured through transition plans and follow-up; holistic well-being supported through regular evaluation and specialist access; and evidence-based cognitive/social support programs with measured outcomes.
Examples of Evidence:
Care plan reflecting personal preference; transition/follow-up plan; well-being evaluation record; cognitive/social support outcome data.
2.5 Individual Outcomes
2.5.1
Flexible and Individualized Services
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Practical, individualized service plans that fit each client's real circumstances; active client engagement in identifying strengths/needs; direct coordination channels with external providers; and a defined turnaround for adjusting services based on feedback, prioritizing high-risk clients.
Examples of Evidence:
Individualized service plan sample; external-provider coordination log; feedback-driven adjustment record with turnaround time noted.
2.5.2
Setting and Achieving Individual Goals
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Personal goals defined to match each client's abilities and aspirations, set with family involvement, tracked with simple tools and reviewed regularly, and backed by the support and resources clients need to reach them.
Examples of Evidence:
Individual goal-tracking record; family involvement sign-off; progress review notes.
2.5.3
Monitoring and Evaluating Individual Progress
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Regular use of evaluation tools (satisfaction surveys, KPIs); clear progress reports shared proactively with families; services adjusted based on findings and feedback; and measurable tracking of efficiency such as response times and goal achievement.
Individualized Education Plans adapted to each child's capability; close coordination with schools and regulators for an inclusive environment; support through educational transitions; and regular review of academic/social progress with plans updated accordingly.
Examples of Evidence:
Individualized Education Plan sample; school coordination record; educational-transition support log.
2.6 Quality of Life & Lifestyle Care
2.6.1
Social Relationships and Interaction
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Safe, accessible spaces for interaction (playgrounds, gathering areas); regular culturally relevant community programs shaped with community input; tailored family-support services; and ongoing monitoring of participation and satisfaction to improve programs.
Examples of Evidence:
Activity/participation calendar; community program design notes showing community input; participation/satisfaction monitoring data.
2.6.2
Personal Interests and Hobbies
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clients actively encouraged and supported to explore new activities and hobbies based on their preferences, with easy access to activity information, and purposeful recreational programs that respect age diversity and build community connection.
Examples of Evidence:
Interest-based activity log; recreational program schedule; activity-information accessibility check.
2.6.3
Community Participation
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Strategic partnerships with local organizations to design joint inclusion programs; active work to remove participation barriers (accessible venues, transport); and evaluation of community programs' impact used to keep improving them.
Examples of Evidence:
Community partnership agreement; participation-barrier action log; community-program impact evaluation.
2.7 Hospitality Services
(Applied only for centers providing these services directly)
2.7.1
Food Services
ESSENTIAL SAFETY BOOSTER
What "Good" Looks Like:
Diverse, nutritionist-approved meals covering special dietary and cultural needs; strict food-safety (HACCP) protocols with daily monitoring; healthy snacks available around the clock; trained food-service staff; and dining areas that are accessible and comfortable for everyone.
Documented chemical/thermal disinfection of all laundry; safe storage of cleaning materials with staff protection; efficient tracking and delivery with quality checks; scheduled, documented linen changes; trained laundry staff; and clothing kept clean, ironed and dignified.
A clear, publicly displayed cleaning schedule with reminders for delays; cleaning tools immediately accessible facility-wide; documented safety data sheets and quality reviews; strict infection-control procedures during cleaning; trained staff; and a policy on personal hygiene/privacy for living spaces.
Examples of Evidence:
Published cleaning schedule; safety data sheets; cleaning quality review record; infection-control procedure checklist.
3.1 Consent, Rights & Responsibilities
3.1.1
Person-Centered Informed Consent Procedures
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clear consent policies for all assessments and interventions; defined procedures for refusal or inability to consent; accessible advocacy support for decision-making; explicit, transparent consent for personal data use; and consent processes adapted to each client's mental capacity, with guardian involvement when needed.
Examples of Evidence:
Signed consent forms; refusal/incapacity procedure document; advocacy-support record; personal data-use consent form.
3.1.2
Respect for Human Rights, Equality and Inclusivity
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
A documented commitment to non-discriminatory, dignified treatment for all clients; rights and responsibilities information provided in accessible formats (Braille, sign language, plain language); inclusive service design considering privacy and diverse needs; and safe, confidential channels to report rights violations with prompt follow-up.
Examples of Evidence:
Non-discrimination policy; rights information in accessible formats; rights-violation reporting log with follow-up record.
3.1.3
Awareness of Responsibilities
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clients and families are given clear, accessible information on their own responsibilities under the service agreement (attendance, conduct, shared decision-making), not just their rights.
Examples of Evidence:
Client/family responsibilities document; sign-off or acknowledgment log.
3.1.4
Management of High-Risk Behaviors
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Staff trained in positive, de-escalation-based behavior management with cultural sensitivity and family involvement; a clear preference for non-restrictive strategies, with restriction used only as a last resort under strict protocol; and transparent documentation and review of every restriction case.
Examples of Evidence:
De-escalation training record; restriction-use documentation and review log; family involvement record for high-risk cases.
3.1.5
Protection of Targeted Groups' Rights
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Additional, documented safeguards for groups at heightened risk (children, People of Determination, non-Arabic speakers), beyond the organization's general rights protections.
Examples of Evidence:
Targeted-group safeguarding procedure; enhanced-protection case record.
3.2 Inclusion & Community Participation
3.2.1
Promoting Participation and Inclusion
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Active outreach and program design that includes clients and families in community life and organizational activities, with participation barriers identified and addressed.
Examples of Evidence:
Community outreach plan; participation-barrier assessment; example of a client in a meaningful inclusion role.
3.3 Independence & Autonomy
3.3.1
Client Participation and Personalized Care
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clients actively empowered to participate in decisions about their own care; clear, interactive information on care options; personalized care plans built with clients/families and kept current; and everyday choices (routines, activities) enabled wherever possible.
Examples of Evidence:
Care-decision participation record; personalized care plan sample; daily-choice accommodation log.
3.3.2
Supporting Independence and Empowerment in Resource Management
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Guidance and education to help clients manage their own personal and financial affairs to the extent of their ability; access to assistive devices/technology that build independence; and multiple service and living options so clients can make real choices.
Examples of Evidence:
Financial/personal-affairs education record; assistive-technology provision log; service or living-option choice record.
3.4 Privacy & Dignity
3.4.1
Ensuring Privacy and Dignity
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
An environment that protects clients' privacy during service delivery; full respect and dignity shown during personal care, accounting for individual comfort and preference; and strict confidentiality in all professional communication about clients, with personal data protected.
Examples of Evidence:
Privacy-protection facility check; personal-care dignity policy; confidentiality and data-protection log.
3.4.2
Respectful Interaction and Identity Affirmation
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
Clients' personal space and boundaries respected at all times; personal belongings handled with care; and clients addressed by their preferred names, with no dehumanizing or offensive language used.
Examples of Evidence:
Preferred-name usage record; personal-belongings handling policy; staff training on respectful interaction.
3.4.3
Physical Environment Respecting Privacy
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Facility layout and shared-space design (waiting areas, consultation rooms) that protects visual and auditory privacy during sensitive conversations or care.
Plain-language, accessible materials that help clients and families understand their options and make informed decisions about care and services.
Examples of Evidence:
Plain-language client information materials; decision-support resource samples.
3.5.2
Supporting Educational Participation
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Support and accommodations that help clients participate in educational settings alongside their service plan, coordinated with schools where relevant.
Examples of Evidence:
Educational participation accommodation record; school coordination log.
3.5.3
Advocacy and Support Services
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Access to independent advocacy or legal-information services for clients and families who need support navigating decisions or disputes.
Examples of Evidence:
Advocacy or legal-referral log; independent advocacy service agreement.
3.6 Complaints & Feedback Mechanisms
3.6.1
Effective Complaint Systems
ESSENTIAL
What "Good" Looks Like:
A user-friendly, confidential complaints system accessible to all clients, including those with communication difficulties; resolution within set timeframes (7 working days standard, 48 hours urgent); a clear escalation/appeal path; and protection for complainants and whistleblowers from retaliation.
Examples of Evidence:
Complaints log with resolution timestamps; escalation/appeal record; whistleblower-protection policy.
3.6.2
Feedback and Suggestion Channels
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Accessible, proactive channels (beyond formal complaints) for clients and families to offer feedback and suggestions, with evidence that feedback is reviewed and acted on.
Examples of Evidence:
Feedback survey results; suggestion-channel log; evidence feedback was reviewed and acted on.
3.7 Business Continuity & Emergency Preparedness
3.7.1
Protection of Targeted Groups in Emergencies
GUIDELINE
What "Good" Looks Like:
Emergency and business-continuity plans that specifically address the needs of vulnerable groups (mobility, communication, medical needs) during evacuation or service disruption.
Examples of Evidence:
Emergency plan addressing vulnerable-group needs; drill records including targeted-group accommodations.
Your Results
Rough readiness based on your self-ratings — not an official assessment result. "Essential only" rows reflect the sub-standards that actually gate your rating.
Leadership & Management (All)
0%
Red — Needs Attention
Leadership & Management (Essential Only)
0%
Red — Needs Attention
Service Delivery (All)
0%
Red — Needs Attention
Service Delivery (Essential Only)
0%
Red — Needs Attention
Clients' & Families' Rights (All)
0%
Red — Needs Attention
Clients' & Families' Rights (Essential Only)
0%
Red — Needs Attention
OVERALL — All 59 Sub-Standards
0%
Red — Needs Attention
OVERALL — Essential Sub-Standards Only (38)
0%
Red — Needs Attention
Readiness Levels:
Green = 70%+ | Strong readiness in this area.
Amber = 40-69% | Developing — attention needed before assessment.
Red = below 40% | Significant gaps — prioritize this area first.
These are simplified bands for internal use, not the official assessment thresholds. Guideline sub-standards don't gate your rating, but are included in the "all 59" rows so nothing is left unreviewed.